Porter’s
5 Forces Model
Michael E. Porter’s well
known framework, known as the five forces model, helps managers to analyse
competitive forces in the industry environment to identify opportunities and
threats. The forces that shape competition within an industry are-
-
The risk of entry by
potential competitors [Threat]
-
The intensity of rivalry
among established companies within an industry [Rivalry]
-
The bargaining power of
buyers [Power]
-
The bargaining power of
suppliers, and [Power]
-
The closeness of
substitute to an industry’s products [Threat]
It can also simply be
said that, 2 Power + 2 Threat + 1 Rivalry = 5 Forces
Risk of Entry by
Potential Competitors:
Potential competitors
are companies that are not currently competing in an industry but have the capability
to do so if they choose. For example, cable television companies have currently
emerged as potential competitors to traditional phone companies. New digital
technologies have allowed cable companies to offer telephone service over the
same cable that transmit television shows.
The intensity of rivalry
among established companies within an industry:
Rivalry is concerned
with the intensity of competition within the industry. There is a high level of
rivalry if competitors are continually reducing prices, introducing new
products and advertising. It identifies the existing barriers, product
differences, brand power, growth rate in industry, fixed costs among firms,
concentration of firms in market share, etc. (Mehta, 2008)
The bargaining power of
buyers:
An industry’s buyers may
be the individual customers who ultimately consume its products (its end users)
or the companies that distribute an industry’s products to end users, such as
retailers and wholesalers. For example, whole soap powder made by Procter &
Gamble and Unilever is consumed by end users, the principal buyers of soap
powder are supermarket chains and discount stores, which resell the product to
end users. The bargaining power of buyer refers to the ability of buyers to
bargain down prices charged by companies in the industry by demanding better
product quality and service. By lowering prices and raising costs, powerful
buyers can squeeze profits out of an industry. Thus, powerful buyers should be
viewed as a threat and vice versa. (Hill, and Jones, 2010),
The bargaining power of
suppliers:
The organisations that
provide inputs into the industry, such as material, services, and labor (which
may be individuals, organisations such as labor unions, or companies that
supply contract labor). The more the
demand of a product, the more it drives the price of the suppliers up in a
market-based system. Greater uniqueness of an input allows a higher price to be
charged and decreases the ability of client firms in the industry to switch easily
between suppliers. A credible threat of a backward integration (that is, owning
own supply) will weaken the power of suppliers. (Ahlstrom, and Bruton, 2010)
The closeness of
substitute to an industry’s products:
The more brand loyal the
customers are, the less the threat of substitutes and the higher in the
incumbent’s sustainable profitability will be. Also, the more distant the
substitutes outside the relevant market, the less price responsive will be
demand, and the larger will be the optimal markups and profit margins. For
example, Flavored and unflavored bottled water and other noncarbonated
beverages such as juice, tea, and sports drinks are growing as much as eight
times faster that U.S. soda sales. This trend will tend to erode the loyalty of
Pepsi and Coke drinkers. If so, profitability will decline. (McGuigan, Moyer,
and Harris, 2011)
Bibliography:
Ahlstrom, D. and Bruton, G. (2010), International Management:
Strategy and Culture in the Emerging World, USA: Cengage Learning
Hill, C. and Jones, G. (2010), Strategic Management Theory:
An Integrated Approach, 9th ed, USA: South-Western Cengage
Learning.
McGuigan, J., Moyer, R. and Harris, F. (2011), Managerial
Economics: Applications, Strategy and Tactics ,12th ed, USA:
South-western, Cengage Learning
Mehta, S. S. (2008), Commercializing Successful Biomedical
Technologies: Basic Principles for the Development of Drugs, Diagnostics and
Devices, UK: Cambridge University Press
Mclvor, R. (2005), The Outsourcing Process: Strategies for
Evaluation and Management, UK: Cambridge University Press
orange juice
ReplyDelete(Download) $12,234 in 2 months Casino Software?
ReplyDeleteLet me get it right.
I dont care about sports. Never cared less.
I tried EVERYTHING from FOREX & stocks to internet marketing and affiliate products.. I even made some money but then blew it all when the stock market went south.
I think I finally found it. Get It TODAY!!